Miyro ha scritto:
come mai ci sono dei dubbi sull'outburst del 1945 ?
Per via della guerra ci sono state poche osservazioni (?), gli spettri non erano adeguati ? Oppure...
Grazie Miyro,
l'outburst del 1945 venne parzialmente osservato (dati AAVSO) a causa della vicinanza della sorgente con il Sole. Per una più completa ed esaustiva storia degli eventi di outburst delle nove ricorrenti osservate, ti rimando al documento "Comprehensive Photometric Histories of All Known Galactic Recurrent Novae" di Schaefer, Bradley E. all'indirizzo:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1 ... /2/275/pdf. In particolare per l'eruzione di RS Oph del 1945 riporta testualmente:
The 1945 eruption of RS Oph is only known from American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO) data, where the star was seen fading from 9.6 mag down into a typical post-eruption dip (Oppenheimer & Mattei 1993). Again, the post-eruption dip was just as the star was coming out from the solar gap in the dawn sky. However, in contrast with the 1907 eruption, the 1945 eruption also shows a definite fading tail during which RS Oph was certainly brighter than at any other
time outside of a nova outburst. The combination of the fading tail and the classical post-eruption dip makes the case for a 1945 nova so strong as to be certain.Saluti
Lorenzo Franco
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A81 Balzaretto Observatory, Rome
http://digilander.libero.it/A81_Observatory/https://www.facebook.com/a81balzarettobservatory/